Showing posts with label 24. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 24. Show all posts
Monday, April 26, 2010
Innovations, er, "Innovations" from broadcast networks -- FOX
Curious to what this all means? Read my introduction to this multi-post series.
My goodness, epic apologies are in order. I remember (barely) when I started this project and hoped to run through the past five years of development for the four major broadcast networks in less than a week. Well, here we are nearly a month later and I'm still only halfway through. This is what happens when you're a graduating senior working two jobs and trying to organize plans for fall. Stupid life.
Anyway, let's get back to it with FOX.
Like CBS, we tend to think FOX has had a good run since 2005. Did I find that to be the case?
Labels:
24,
American Idol,
Bones,
Broadcast Innovation Project,
FOX,
Fringe,
Glee,
Projects,
SCHEDULING,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Fandom and serial TV -- Letting go, holding on
A lot of ink has been spilled about the future of serial television, but even if I do not think that it is "going away" or "dying," I've recently been thinking about how troubling it is to be a fan of these types of series.
As a fan of serial television, there are usually two things that happen to me. And there are two series on the air right now that embody them perfectly: FlashForward and 24.
Labels:
24,
CHUCK,
Fans,
FLASHFORWARD,
RATINGS,
Ratings Report,
SCHEDULING,
SERIALIZATION,
TV DISCUSSION
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Should NBC pause the ticking clock on '24?'
Last week, rumblings were that 24 would finish out its eight-year run this May on FOX. Now, Ausiello is reporting that 20th Century Fox (the studio) is pitching the series to NBC, who obviously need space-fillers on its schedule.
One question for NBC: why?
One question for NBC: why?
Labels:
24,
Business,
CHUCK,
END DATES,
FOX,
NBC,
SERIALIZATION,
SONS OF ANARCHY,
TV DISCUSSION
Friday, February 26, 2010
Just end it already! Genre television and end dates
As we've all seen over the past month, the end of Lost has sparked a slew of different conversations about the future of television, formats, serialization, etc. One move that Lost proponents always cite as the turning point in the series was the agreement to end it all back in 2007.
And now, that idea gets thrown around for nearly every series with any extended mythology. But should it?
Monday, February 15, 2010
The dead-end "dead" serial discussion: It's not happening
I've talked a lot about serialized television lately, and it seems like a lot of TV critics and scholars have the same thing on their mind with Lost coming to an end.
In the past few weeks, a slew of articles and columns have hit the web about the topic, with some writing the serials eulogy.
Simply put: Those people are wrong.
Labels:
24,
BREAKING BAD,
DAMAGES,
DEXTER,
DVD SALES,
LOST,
MAD MEN,
RATINGS,
SERIALIZATION,
SERIALIZED TV,
SONS OF ANARCHY,
STUPID ARGUMENTS,
TRENDS,
TRUE BLOOD
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



