Showing posts with label TV DISCUSSION. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV DISCUSSION. Show all posts
Monday, April 26, 2010
Innovations, er, "Innovations" from broadcast networks -- FOX
Curious to what this all means? Read my introduction to this multi-post series.
My goodness, epic apologies are in order. I remember (barely) when I started this project and hoped to run through the past five years of development for the four major broadcast networks in less than a week. Well, here we are nearly a month later and I'm still only halfway through. This is what happens when you're a graduating senior working two jobs and trying to organize plans for fall. Stupid life.
Anyway, let's get back to it with FOX.
Like CBS, we tend to think FOX has had a good run since 2005. Did I find that to be the case?
Labels:
24,
American Idol,
Bones,
Broadcast Innovation Project,
FOX,
Fringe,
Glee,
Projects,
SCHEDULING,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Hulu attempts to monetize -- My reaction
The time has finally come.
This week, Hulu brass announced their intentions to start charging for certain bundles of content.
Labels:
Active Audiences,
Hulu,
iPad,
iTunes,
Streaming Video,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
In which I worry about 'Glee'
I think Glee is in trouble.
Not to offend all you Gleeks out there, because I consider myself a major fan of the series, but something is just...off about the first two episodes back. I cannot put my finger on it. Is it the long lay-off between the first 13 episodes and the back nine? Is it the overwhelming sense that the series has been overhyped during that period? Not really, because I expected that.
Not to offend all you Gleeks out there, because I consider myself a major fan of the series, but something is just...off about the first two episodes back. I cannot put my finger on it. Is it the long lay-off between the first 13 episodes and the back nine? Is it the overwhelming sense that the series has been overhyped during that period? Not really, because I expected that.
Labels:
Active Audiences,
Advertising,
FOX,
Glee,
Monetization,
Network News,
TV DISCUSSION
Saturday, April 10, 2010
What's the future of serialization on broadcast TV?
I've talked a lot about serialization here on the blog, and it's just as popular elsewhere (check out a nice post from Myles McNutt on Justified), partially because it's the end of two major serial powerhouses in Lost and 24 and also because I think people just love talking about it. So why not continue that discussion?
Today: what to expect from serialization on the broadcast networks.
Today: what to expect from serialization on the broadcast networks.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Catching up on DVD -- What changes?
One of the best TV critics around, Myles McNutt, has a poll up on his web site right now that will help him choose what series to catch up on via DVD here in the coming months.
Obviously, DVD has done wonders for television viewers. We can wait until a entire season -- or series -- ends before watching. And of course, that also allows us to avoid both the long wait between episodes and commercials. Even more benefits certainly exist.
But what happens to our enjoyment of the season, series or even individual episodes when we catch up later on DVD?
Labels:
Active Audiences,
Deadwood,
DVD SALES,
DVD Viewing,
Fans,
HBO,
SERIALIZATION,
TV DISCUSSION
Saturday, April 3, 2010
DirecTV to save 'Damages?'
Rumors abound that Sony, producers of Damages, is looking to DirecTV for help in paying for a fourth season.
Not to be a contrarian here, but is this really necessary?
Labels:
DAMAGES,
FX,
Network News,
SERIALIZED TV,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Monday, March 29, 2010
Thank you, Shawn -- Celebrating the performance of one of wrestling's greatest
I'll say it, I love professional wrestling. Have ever since I was six years old way back in 1994 when I randomly started watching on a semi-regular basis. Through the Monday Night Wars, the WCW buyout and the current "PG" era of the WWE, there's one individual that kept me coming back every week -- even during his four year absence as I sat around hoping he'd pop up -- Shawn Michaels. The Heartbreak Kid. The Showstopper. Mr. Wrestlemania.
Tonight on RAW, HBK said his tearful goodbyes and I was choked up right along with him. Not just because he's a charming character or fantastic in-ring performer, but because he is, without a doubt, one of the best pure performers I have ever seen, no matter the media or showcase.
Labels:
Performers,
Rants,
SERIALIZED TV,
Shawn Michaels,
Storytelling,
TV DISCUSSION,
Wrestling
Innovations, er, "Innovations" from broadcast networks -- CBS
Curious to what this all means? Read my introduction to this multi-post series.
We tend to think that CBS has had the best run of success in the last handful of years, but after my research did my mind get blown?
We tend to think that CBS has had the best run of success in the last handful of years, but after my research did my mind get blown?
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Innovations, er, "Innovations" from broadcast networks -- ABC
Curious as to what this all means? Read my introduction to this multi-post series.
Of all the networks I researched for this project, I think ABC's results surprised me the most.
And that's not a good thing.
Of all the networks I researched for this project, I think ABC's results surprised me the most.
And that's not a good thing.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Innovations, er, "Innovations" from broadcast networks -- An introduction
Though I have been using it for more, this blog was primarily constituted for a course about the changes in what we refer to as "television." Along with this blog, I am also working on a presentation/paper about the content and format innovations from "traditional" (read: broadcast) networks in this dynamic time.
Over the past few weeks, I've been doing some fairly in-depth research into not only what series the four majors -- ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC -- have aired, but also what "kind" of series. Thanks to The Futon Critic's fantastic DevWatch and ShowWatch archives, I was able to go back five years to the 2005-2006 television season and determine every single series the broadcast networks have aired. From there, I researched each series to determine both the format and the "type" of characters the series (if scripted) showcased. After hours upon hours of scrolling, reading and entering into a five-tabbed, color-coded Excel sheet, I am both surprised and not surprised at what I found. Thus, I thought it would be nice to share some of my findings in this space with anyone who wants to read them.
But first, let me clarify a few of the statements or choices I mentioned above as a way to introduce the posts I'll be writing in the next week or so about each network, because I know you're asking the following questions. I'll ask them for you.
Labels:
ABC,
Advertising,
Broadcast Innovation Project,
Business,
CBS,
Characters,
DVR,
FORMATS,
FOX,
Monetization,
NBC,
Network News,
Projects,
RATINGS,
Storytelling,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Fandom and serial TV -- Letting go, holding on
A lot of ink has been spilled about the future of serial television, but even if I do not think that it is "going away" or "dying," I've recently been thinking about how troubling it is to be a fan of these types of series.
As a fan of serial television, there are usually two things that happen to me. And there are two series on the air right now that embody them perfectly: FlashForward and 24.
Labels:
24,
CHUCK,
Fans,
FLASHFORWARD,
RATINGS,
Ratings Report,
SCHEDULING,
SERIALIZATION,
TV DISCUSSION
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Broadcast networks and miniseries -- Will it ever happen again?
Well, I guess that headline is partially dumb and misleading, because obviously the major broadcast networks will air a miniseries at least one more time in the future. I think.
But what I meant by that headline is can the broadcast networks actually air a quality miniseries?
Labels:
Business,
Cable Networks,
Emmy Awards,
Event TV,
FORMATS,
HBO,
Media,
Miniseries,
Monetization,
NBC,
Pitches,
SCHEDULING,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION,
TWITTER
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Should NBC pause the ticking clock on '24?'
Last week, rumblings were that 24 would finish out its eight-year run this May on FOX. Now, Ausiello is reporting that 20th Century Fox (the studio) is pitching the series to NBC, who obviously need space-fillers on its schedule.
One question for NBC: why?
One question for NBC: why?
Labels:
24,
Business,
CHUCK,
END DATES,
FOX,
NBC,
SERIALIZATION,
SONS OF ANARCHY,
TV DISCUSSION
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Watching TV on the Internet -- Only on the Internet
As someone who watches a lot of television on my laptop, I have spent time wondering if I really needed to cable television. Those moments of reflection usually come when my damn Comcast bill arrives in the mail each month.
This week, the New York Times profiled some folks who have more willpower than I and thus risen up against their cable providers.
This week, the New York Times profiled some folks who have more willpower than I and thus risen up against their cable providers.
Labels:
Flash Video,
Hulu,
Internet Culture,
Monetization,
Streaming Video,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION,
TWITTER
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
NBC reboot has begun: Where to now?
Tonight -- well, I guess this week since Leno's Tonight Show started yesterday -- is the makeshift reboot of NBC's schedule, as it's newest hope for ratings success, positive critical response and good buzz, Parenthood debuts at 10 PM.
In the last year, NBC's undergone a slew of changes that more or less led to nothing. So where do we stand with the Peacock network?
Labels:
Business,
CHUCK,
Conan O'Brien,
Jay Leno,
NBC,
Network News,
Parenthood,
Parks and Rec,
RATINGS,
Ratings Report,
SCHEDULING,
Southland,
TV DISCUSSION
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Twitter and TV viewing: Pay attention to me!
In the last week, a couple of stories have been written about the growing use of Twitter during live television events and the interactive culture created by it.
So obviously, people have taken to Twitter to talking about, which allowed me to find the articles.
Labels:
Active Audiences,
Audiences,
Internet Culture,
Media,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION,
TWITTER
Friday, February 26, 2010
Just end it already! Genre television and end dates
As we've all seen over the past month, the end of Lost has sparked a slew of different conversations about the future of television, formats, serialization, etc. One move that Lost proponents always cite as the turning point in the series was the agreement to end it all back in 2007.
And now, that idea gets thrown around for nearly every series with any extended mythology. But should it?
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Streaming video news part three: iTunes episodes for 99 cents?
There have been a few interesting developments in streaming video this week, all of which should have long-term implications for the television industry. I'm hoping to write about all three over the next day or so. Click here to see my thoughts on Hulu to the iPad and HBO's GO.
Though this news item isn't quite "streaming video" specifically, it's still important to discuss. Rumors are swirling that CBS might start selling episodes of its television series on iTunes for only 99 cents.
Labels:
Apple,
Business,
CBS,
Hulu,
iPad,
iTunes,
Monetization,
Pay Content,
SCHEDULING,
Streaming Video,
TRENDS,
TV DISCUSSION
Friday, February 5, 2010
'Lost' burnout and the frustrations of serialization
I hate to keep writing about Lost, but over the past few weeks, its return has been the best story that is being covered from all angles.
Last time I discussed the end of Lost meaning the end of well-respected serialization on broadcast network television. Today, let's look at another reason why serialization, especially heavy serialization, might not work so well for audiences in the future.
Labels:
BREAKING BAD,
EPISODE ORDERS,
LOST,
MAD MEN,
SCHEDULING,
SERIALIZATION,
THE WIRE,
TRUE BLOOD,
TV DISCUSSION
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















